Twitter is challenging Facebook. And early in 2012,
text messaging went ahead of phone calls to become the most popular method of
keeping in touch. It seems we prefer communicating in as few words as possible. So,
is there still a place for long copy in these 140-character times?
We’ve just wrapped a 49 page Corporate Responsibility report for commercial property giants, Land Security. And, although it contains
its fair share of diagrams and characterful shots of buildings and people, there’s
still an awful lot of copy.
Which got me thinking. When is it a good idea to have
long copy? Because most people assume the shorter the better.
Here are three reasons why going long was appropriate for
Land Securities’ CR report:
1. Having a lot of content is a message in itself. It shows Land Securities actually have something to say on the topic and take it seriously.
2. Long copy allows them to satisfy the needs of lots of different audiences. Everyone from the skim-reading employee who wants to check if she works for the good guys to the conscientious investment analyst boning up on a potential investment. There’s a summary spread. But, if you want it, there’s lots of detail.
3. You can approach your subject from multiple angles – making the most of case studies, discursive sections and employee contributions while still including the usual CEO letter and comment from stakeholders. This gives the piece a rich perspective.
So,
with all this going for it, why shouldn’t we always have long copy?
It won’t
fit through the letterbox
Direct
marketers have long loved the loquacious. These long copy masters argue that if
someone’s not in the market for a product, they won’t read an ad about it
anyway. But if they are, they’ll be hungry for information. So feed them.
This
way of thinking dominated the direct marketing industry throughout the 70s and
80s and had an impact on advertising too. Agency gurus like David Ogilvy and
Drayton Bird swore blind that long copy pulled better than short. Why? Because it
allows you to present all of the benefits while anticipating and addressing all
the objections.
The perfect length?
So where
does long copy sit in the digital age? There’s general agreement that web pages
mustn’t stray over 200 words. Why? Because you don’t want the viewer
to have to scroll. If you’ve got more to say, provide a ‘read more’
link.
Actually, according to this research, people don't mind scrolling. More people will read on if you let copy run down the page than if you put the copy on another page and link to it.
Actually, according to this research, people don't mind scrolling. More people will read on if you let copy run down the page than if you put the copy on another page and link to it.
Emails shouldn’t take up too much of the reader’s time. The perfect email should let the recipient know what it's about in the subject header using 60 to 70 characters. The body copy gives enough information to for them
know what to do next. Attachments and links are there for more
info. Then again, if you believe the research, you risk losing their attention if you invite them to click through. Far better to convey the relevant messages concisely in one email.
Is that last paragraph too long? Google and Amazon use lots of white space. They must know. So yes, it probably was. Online, paragraphs should be kept down to four lines or so.
Is that last paragraph too long? Google and Amazon use lots of white space. They must know. So yes, it probably was. Online, paragraphs should be kept down to four lines or so.
And
sentences? How long should they be? The people who research these things say that
sentences of over 15 words are too complex to be read easily.
The theory goes that we’re all so overloaded with information these days (live news, social media, virals of cats playing keyboards) that we don’t have the attention spans we used to. We need to be engaged quickly – or we won’t be engaged at all.
The theory goes that we’re all so overloaded with information these days (live news, social media, virals of cats playing keyboards) that we don’t have the attention spans we used to. We need to be engaged quickly – or we won’t be engaged at all.
Maybe.
But keeping it relevant doesn't have to mean keeping it short. A 50 word email
can take ages to read if the writer is vague. A 300,000 word novel can leave
you wanting even more, if it’s good.
So if
the medium allows it, and your audience is likely to be interested in it; include
it. Just check the content’s going to help influence them in the way you want.
And find a way of making it interesting.
Length requires narrative
People
talk about the narrative or story - even in a factual piece. They usually mean
the main thread or message that everything supports. A sense of a clear
narrative comes from having content that is both, 1) relevant
to the main message and, 2) presented to the reader in the most compelling order.
There
are story telling techniques used in dramatic writing, such as stimulating active
questions in the audience’s mind that engage their curiosity – but that’s for
another blog.
Length requires variety and surprise
If
you go long, you have to vary the sentence length and complexity to add
interest. Sounding fresh through the choice of unexpected words and adopting a distinctive tone helps
too.
So, to go long or to go short?
Inevitably,
it’s driven by the medium and the message. Some forms of writing will always be
short – names, straplines and tweets, obviously - but also emails and home
pages. But then again, there are always those who break the rules and win out
by standing out. ‘I can’t believe it’s not butter’ is
a sentence that became a great name.
And,
if you’ve got a lot to say and the medium doesn’t allow it, you can link to one
that does. How many tweets link to websites? And although web pages are only
200 words or so, those words link. Aren’t websites really one piece chopped up
into many different sections, each answering different questions that might be
asked?
No comments:
Post a Comment